In Gaza, repeated displacement, bombardment and the destruction of essential services have altered the daily conditions in which Palestinian families live. In September 2025, an independent United Nations commission concluded that Israeli authorities and security forces had committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. This investigation follows the documents behind that conclusion and the accounts Palestinians have published of their own experiences, then examines the Israeli government's responses and the decisions taken in Washington.
The figures and documentary exhibits in this investigation are attributed to their dated sources. The interactive sections distinguish findings from contested or unresolved claims.
The investigation begins with the material conditions facing Palestinians in Gaza and proceeds through the legal findings, documented U.S. assistance and publicly available first-person accounts. Its pro-Palestinian editorial perspective is explicit, including criticism of political Zionism's role in Palestinian dispossession and unequal rights. The interactive evidence sections distinguish original government statements from independent investigations so readers can see the source and date of each significant claim.
What the courts have decided
The International Court of Justice has issued provisional measures in the case brought by South Africa against Israel, and as of October 2026 it has not decided the genocide allegations on their merits. The September 2025 conclusion of the independent United Nations commission is an investigative finding issued by a different body. Throughout the article, these records are identified according to the authority that produced them and what they establish.
The political criticism here concerns the development and exercise of state power, including Zionism's relationship to Palestinian displacement and restrictions on rights. Palestinian scholarship informs this framing, while responsibility for particular actions is assigned through documentary evidence. Jewish communities and Israeli civilians are not treated as collectively responsible for decisions made by state institutions or named officials. This distinction allows scrutiny of government policy without collapsing the experiences of different populations into a single claim of culpability.
In early October 2026, aid organizations reported Palestinian families sheltering in unsafe buildings or makeshift encampments as another winter approached. OCHA estimated that approximately 279,000 people were in flood-prone sites or unsafe buildings, while desalination facilities in southern Gaza operated far below capacity because equipment and spare parts were unavailable. Its report estimated that 74% of residents relied on trucked drinking water. These conditions persisted nearly one year after a ceasefire agreement and three years after the war began. [07]
When water supplies are interrupted, families must find other ways to obtain enough safe water for drinking and sanitation, often while living in damaged or temporary accommodation. Medical care also depends on electricity, functioning equipment and supplies that can be replenished. The humanitarian reports describe how the loss of those systems continues to shape the lives of civilians after a particular attack has ended.
The UN commission, Amnesty International and Israeli human-rights organizations reached genocide conclusions after examining conduct affecting Palestinians in Gaza and evidence concerning intent. Israel disputes those findings and says its military campaign sought to defeat Hamas. Readers can consult the institutional reports alongside the state's responses, with the independent commission's legal conclusion clearly separated from the judgment that remains pending before the ICJ. [01][02][04][10]
When civilians are deprived of the means of staying alive, the record cannot be confined to a count of bombs dropped or buildings destroyed.
The Hamas-led attacks of October 7, 2023 killed approximately 1,200 people in Israel and involved the taking of 251 hostages, according to the cited records. The UN commission also documented crimes by Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups against Israeli civilians. Israel subsequently described defeating Hamas and securing the hostages as military objectives. This investigation tests the conduct and restrictions imposed during that campaign against the protections owed to Palestinian civilians and the Genocide Convention's separate requirements concerning prohibited acts and intent. [31][01]
The ceasefire's aftermath / IOM institutional release / 9 October 2026
Gaza’s shelter crisis in October 2026
In an October 9, 2026 release, the International Organization for Migration estimated that 1.98 million people in Gaza needed shelter-related assistance. Available and incoming materials could partially address only about 17% of assessed winter-specific shelter needs. This percentage measures the share of assessed need that those supplies could cover; it does not represent the share of families already housed, and the source describes tents and makeshift shelters deteriorating as winter approaches.
The 17% represents the share of identified winter-specific shelter requirements covered by partners' available and incoming supplies as reported by IOM. It is not the percentage of Gazans housed, and it does not count deaths or current tents distributed. Read the IOM institutional release (French) ↗
17%WINTER SHELTER NEED COVERED BY REPORTED SUPPLY PIPELINE
1.77mPeople in displacement sites, as of 5 October 2026, per IOM/Site Management Cluster56%Displacement sites in medium- or high-risk flooding areas, according to IOM's 9 October release
02 / A satellite record
How much of Gaza's built environment was damaged?
55%
UNOSAT identified approximately 55% of structures as damaged or possibly damaged in a May 2024 satellite assessment.
UNOSAT's satellite assessments compare images from specified dates and classify structures as damaged or possibly damaged. The figures document changes to the built environment under the agency's methodology, although the imagery does not determine who was inside individual buildings or why each structure was damaged. The legal findings in the next section draw upon a wider evidentiary record.
Measured destruction · Satellite assessment
82% of Gaza's structures
Using imagery dated June 16, 2026, UNOSAT classified 201,290 structures as damaged or possibly damaged, approximately 82% of structures across Gaza, according to OCHA's August summary. The adjacent grid displays the proportion using identical tiles; it is an illustration of the reported percentage and does not show where individual buildings were located.
How investigators assessed genocide under international law
Article II of the 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide through specified acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a protected national, ethnic, racial or religious group as such. The treaty identifies five categories of acts. In September 2025, an independent UN commission found reasonable grounds to conclude that Israeli authorities and security forces committed acts in four categories and possessed the required intent. The panels below explain those categories with links to the Convention and the commission's analysis; the ICJ proceedings on state responsibility remain pending. [01][09]
Each panel identifies a category of conduct under Article II and summarizes the commission's finding in that category. The requirement to establish specific intent applies to the alleged genocide as a whole, and a documented act alone does not establish that intent. Readers can open the underlying report to examine how the commission evaluated the evidence.
Killing members of the group
The commission examined deaths during Israeli military operations, including attacks affecting densely populated civilian areas, and concluded that the killing of Palestinians in Gaza fell within Article II(a) of the Genocide Convention. This is the commission's legal assessment of the evidence it reviewed, rather than a final judgment by the International Court of Justice.
Sources: UN Commission of Inquiry (2025); Genocide Convention Article II(a).
Five acts exist in Article II; the UN commission reported finding four of them.Read the convention ↗
04 / Medical destruction and children
The destruction of healthcare and its effects on children
In July 2025, Physicians for Human Rights–Israel concluded that the destruction of Gaza's healthcare system met the criteria for genocide, citing attacks on facilities and impediments to treatment. A UN commission report issued in June 2026 recorded at least 20,179 Palestinian children killed and 44,143 injured during its defined review period. The commission also examined what the loss of healthcare and schooling meant for children who survived. The figures are tied to that report's cutoff date and must not be presented as live totals. [05][06]
The commission's figures represent children whose deaths or injuries were recorded within a defined reporting period. Its report also describes the effect of destroyed or inaccessible treatment on children who survived, including the additional danger created when ordinary care cannot be obtained. The testimony section retains the names and experiences provided by Palestinian witnesses, while photographs and recorded voices remain at their original publishers unless the rights and permissions for reuse are established.
UN Commission / June 2026 report
20,179
Children reported killed in the commission’s review of violations since October 2023. Figure belongs to the report and its covered period; it is not a live casualty counter. Source 06
UN / April 2026 reconstruction assessment
$71.4bn
Estimated ten-year recovery and reconstruction needs, covering housing and the destruction of essential services and productive infrastructure. Source 08
Original satellite visual / held at source
View UNITAR's satellite comparison in its original report with the published methodological context.
Source-hosted imagery has intentionally not been republished here. This reference supplements the separately dated UNOSAT damage assessments; it is not a visualization of 82% of Gaza's buildings.
05 / The United States
The documented U.S. military relationship
The United States' security relationship with Israel is documented through records that distinguish budgetary commitments from weapons shipments and proposed transactions. The 2016 memorandum anticipated $3.3 billion annually in Foreign Military Financing and $500 million for joint missile defense through fiscal 2028, subject to congressional appropriation. Later government and congressional records describe deliveries and possible sales, whose dates and transaction stages are displayed separately in the evidence desk. [11]
As humanitarian organizations reported extensive civilian deprivation, U.S. officials continued to make decisions about military financing and proposed weapons transfers. The public record permits scrutiny of those decisions, though transaction-level proof is required before connecting a particular item of U.S. equipment to a particular strike. Washington's March 2026 intervention in the ICJ case is documented separately as a legal position on the interpretation of the Genocide Convention.
2016 memorandum / FY2019–FY2028$3.3bn per year
Planned Foreign Military Financing subject to appropriation. This is a U.S. security funding category, not a verified Gaza strike ledger. Source
2016 memorandum / FY2019–FY2028$500m per year
Planned joint missile-defense program funding under the agreement, likewise subject to appropriation. Source
Outstanding documentary workWeapons and decisions
A stronger finding about responsibility for a particular attack would require transaction-level delivery records, reliable end-use evidence and the relevant governmental decision history. Those records are not established by a financing total or a general shipment estimate alone.
Examine the principal counterargument and the limits of these findings
Israel's published legal position emphasizes attacks on Hamas military capabilities and describes warning procedures and humanitarian measures it says were adopted. The documentary comparisons in this investigation examine those official assertions alongside identified incidents and the restrictions humanitarian organizations reported. Their significance is assessed in the context of the commission's broader findings, without assuming that any single incident resolves the legal question of genocidal intent. UN Commission · Amnesty · Reuters
The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant in November 2024 on allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity, rather than genocide. Those criminal proceedings concern individual responsibility and remain distinct from South Africa's case before the International Court of Justice concerning state obligations under the Genocide Convention. ICC · ICJ
Document desk / United States
How to distinguish American financing from delivered weapons
The four tabs separate planned financing, reported deliveries, notified possible sales and proposals still under discussion. Dates, reported quantities and the stage of each transaction are displayed in the source panels. A notification of a possible sale does not demonstrate that its items were delivered, and a delivery report does not independently establish where a specific weapon was used.
EXAMINE THE RECORD
Planned framework · subject to appropriation
$3.3bn / year
FY2019–2028 memorandum
Foreign Military Financing
The 2016 bilateral memorandum anticipated $3.3 billion in annual Foreign Military Financing, subject to congressional appropriation. This is a planned funding framework rather than an itemized record of weapons used in Gaza.
Evidentiary boundary: approved funding cannot be equated with a delivered or used weapon.
The figures in this desk describe different periods and transaction stages. They are deliberately kept separate because adding them together would produce an unsupported estimate of weapons used in Gaza.
New original document / 12 March 2026
The United States’ arguments before the ICJ
On March 12, 2026, the United States filed a declaration under Article 63 in the ICJ proceedings known as South Africa v. Israel. Washington disputed the genocide allegations and argued for a demanding evidentiary standard when inferring intent from a pattern of conduct. Its filing concerns interpretation of the Genocide Convention; it does not resolve the underlying case, in which the Court has not issued a final merits judgment.
US positionUN investigative findingJudicial status
Exhibit / 01
UNITED STATES
Declaration of intervention, 12 March 2026
America’s position on genocidal intent
The filing states that the United States rejects the genocide allegations against Israel. It argues that the Court should maintain its existing demanding standard for inferring intent from a pattern of conduct and assess potential alternative explanations. The declaration also expressly acknowledges that pursuit of a military objective can coexist with genocidal intent.
Limit of the evidence: The U.S. declaration sets out the legal argument of an intervening state concerning interpretation of the Convention. It neither decides the case nor establishes what a particular official knew when a specific transfer was authorized.
South Africa initiates its Genocide Convention proceedings against Israel.
12 MAR 2026
The United States files an Article 63 declaration on treaty interpretation.
21 MAY 2026
The Court sets subsequent written-pleading deadlines, including South Africa’s Reply in November 2027.
The records linked here are a U.S. treaty-interpretation submission, an independent commission's investigative findings and the Court's procedural docket. Their different authors and functions matter when evaluating the argument about genocide, particularly because the ICJ has not yet determined the merits. U.S. declaration · UN commission · ICJ docket
A further procedural development occurred on 22 September 2026: Colombia withdrew its April 2024 Article 63 declaration of intervention. The ICJ confirmed that withdrawal, which concerns Colombia’s participation and leaves South Africa’s underlying case pending. Read the ICJ announcement ↗
Official statements · 2023–2025
Official statements in their documentary context
The documentary inquiry into intent requires attention to who spoke, the date of publication and the limits of the available recording. The first source presents the broadcaster's account of Gallant's siege announcement, while the second includes Herzog's contemporaneous clarification of his earlier remarks. A third panel shows how the independent UN commission evaluated statements together with the broader pattern of conduct.
9 OCTOBER 2023 · KNESSET TELEVISION CHANNEL
The siege announcement on a dated Hebrew-language recording
אין חשמל, אין מזון, אין מים, אין דלק.
The broadcaster's Hebrew description states that the defence minister announced a siege and restrictions on essential supplies. The short quoted phrase is reproduced from the channel's published description, rather than presented as a certified transcription of unedited audio.
The exhibits distinguish documented public statements from independently established actions.
Documentary chronology · 2023–2025
Official statements and their contemporary humanitarian context
The sources in this chronology were produced by different institutions at different points in the campaign. Israeli military statements describe public objectives and announced operations, while humanitarian organizations report the circumstances confronting civilians. The commission's later assessment interprets a larger evidentiary record. Readers can follow the dated sequence without treating a public statement as direct proof of responsibility for any specific strike.
An IDF briefing described extensive attacks and consequences for Gaza.
In its October 9, 2023 English briefing, the IDF quoted spokesperson Daniel Hagari discussing attacks involving thousands of munitions and an aerial operation by 60 aircraft, together with an asserted objective that residents remaining in Gaza would understand the consequences of war. The transcript identified targets the IDF said were associated with Hamas, which establishes the military's public account of its purpose while leaving the independent legality and circumstances of individual attacks unresolved.
Evidentiary boundary: Official English text confirms what was published as the IDF's position. It does not establish independent translation of an uncut speech, the approval chain for individual strikes, or criminal responsibility.
Methodological noteThe source types differ: an Israeli institution's primary statement, an independent humanitarian assessment, an official government statement and an investigative commission's subsequent legal conclusion. None should be relabeled as a final International Court of Justice merits judgment.
Water restrictions and their documented civilian consequences
This timeline follows reported changes in access to water after the October 2023 siege announcement. UNRWA and OCHA documented interruptions and partial restorations, the Israeli government set out its later account of the restrictions, and the ICJ ordered provisional measures on humanitarian assistance in March 2024. The operational records establish distinct conditions at distinct dates; the underlying individual administrative decisions are not reconstructed here.
How to read this evidenceChoose a date. The publisher, what the document establishes and its limits change with it. Document dates and observed-event dates are distinguished wherever necessary.
DOCUMENT 01 / 062023Broadcast statement + UN observation
KNESSET TV + UNRWA
An announced siege and interruption of supply
Knesset TV published an edited Hebrew-language excerpt of Defense Minister Yoav Gallant's siege announcement on October 9, 2023. UNRWA subsequently reported that drinking-water supply from Israel was cut on that date, creating a contemporaneous connection between the public announcement and reported humanitarian conditions without establishing the individual administrative steps behind each interruption.
Boundary: the edited broadcast is not an uncut military directive. A dated sequence alone does not demonstrate which order caused every interruption.
The UN commission subsequently concluded that the wider record, including statements and a pattern of conduct, supported a finding of genocidal intent. The narrower water chronology helps establish what was publicly announced and what humanitarian organizations reported at the time. It does not identify every person responsible for implementation or independently establish intent behind each separate interruption. Inspect the commission report ↗
07 / Evidentiary challenge · GZA-008–010
Compare the published claims with the underlying records
The comparison desk examines specific claims made by Israeli institutions against the reports and records most relevant to each claim. Where the documents conflict, the panel identifies the precise point of disagreement and retains context that limits what can be concluded. The examples cannot establish the legality of every military operation, and readers can open both original sources.
Official claim / first document
Israel's June 2026 objection
Israel's foreign ministry argued that the UN commission erased Israeli children killed or abducted by Hamas from its analysis.
The commission expressly described harm to Israeli children on October 7 and reiterated findings against Hamas and other armed groups. That fact challenges the categorical wording of the ministry's allegation without determining whether every criticism of the report is false.
The comparison identifies where published statements disagree and where an institution acknowledged error or supplied a qualification. Findings about individual criminal intent would require a separate evidentiary and legal examination.
The Palestinians whose accounts appear here spoke to B'Tselem field researchers under their own names. Their accounts describe bereavement, the search for basic necessities and repeated displacement, with interview dates visible at the original publisher. The article offers short, attributed summaries and links to each full account. It does not claim that every circumstance described by a witness has been independently adjudicated, and it does not republish personal media without verified permission.
1 September 2025 · Olfat al-Kurd
Hanaa al-Batniji
A mother describes losing her 17-year-old son Ahmad in August 2025 amid hunger, an underlying medical condition and inaccessible treatment. The cause and sequence are reported from her testimony.
After release from detention in October 2025, Salem reports learning that his wife and children had died during his imprisonment. The source identifies the family and the reported dates of their deaths.
Source illustrations and photographs are intentionally omitted. No reenacted voices, simulated witnesses, or inferred photographs are used.
Beyond destruction / Palestinian authorship
غزة
Palestinian society and political agency beyond the destruction
Palestinian life in Gaza has included education, civic organizations and cultural traditions developed across generations, and those histories persist in the memories and work of displaced communities. Political and legal debates about Gaza's future concern the people who live there and their rights to freedom of movement and self-determination. Palestinian-created research is linked here so the historical and political discussion extends beyond the documented destruction.
Visualizing Palestine brings Palestinian research and visual storytelling to questions of displacement and political rights. Its published work offers a route into the historical context of this investigation and into debates about Palestinian futures. The link is a reference to its publicly available material and does not indicate that the organization participated in or endorsed this project.
Reuters reported that Israeli strikes killed five Palestinians in Gaza on October 10, 2026, during the period following the previous year's ceasefire agreement. The same report attributed a cumulative toll of more than 74,000 Palestinian deaths to Gaza health authorities as of its publication date. Separately, OCHA documented continuing constraints on shelter and water services. These sources describe the persistence of danger and deprivation while retaining their different methods and reporting periods. [12][07]
The commission's finding of genocide is based on its analysis of prohibited acts and specific intent, with related conclusions issued by other human-rights organizations. Palestinian testimony records the experiences of particular families, while humanitarian assessments measure the destruction of homes and essential services. U.S. records establish documented military and legal decisions. The reader can therefore examine how these separate bodies of evidence relate to the allegations, while recognizing what each source can and cannot establish.
DOCUMENTS AND SOURCES · OCTOBER 2026
Source documents and reporting
The documents cited throughout this investigation are collected below. Each link leads to an available official record, institutional report or published account. Disputed findings and limitations are identified in the accompanying analysis.
Further reading includes research and analysis by Palestinian authors, along with materials explaining the standards used to make this documentary interface accessible.
As of October 2026, the ICJ has ordered provisional measures in South Africa's case but has not decided the genocide allegation on its merits. The UN commission reached its own genocide determination in September 2025, applying an investigative standard to the evidence it reviewed. The commission and Court have different mandates, and the website links both records.
ICJ docket ↗Does damage to 82% of buildings prove intent by itself?
UNOSAT's estimate concerns structures assessed as damaged or possibly damaged from satellite imagery dated June 2026. It documents the extraordinary extent of destruction, while the legal issue of genocidal intent requires assessment of additional conduct and evidence. The UN commission reached its conclusion from that wider record.
OCHA–UNOSAT assessment ↗Does a U.S. arms authorization prove a particular strike used that weapon?
Financing commitments, sale notifications, approvals, shipments and verified use are different stages in a weapons transaction. Public records document extensive U.S. security assistance to Israel, but linking a specific munition to an individual strike requires evidence beyond a general aid figure.
The witness section links to attributed B'Tselem interviews and provides brief summaries. It does not reproduce photographs or recordings without verified reuse rights and does not create simulated survivor testimony. Each witness's original account remains available at its publisher's website.
Consult the records and available public resources
The resource links connect readers to original records, official ways to contact elected representatives and published information about Palestinian-rights advocacy. This page does not collect contact details, and links to organizations do not imply sponsorship or an editorial partnership.
The resources are provided for independent use, and the website does not send messages or disclose information on a reader's behalf.
Documentary record · October 2026
The evidence presented here is attributed to dated records and published reporting. Source limitations remain visible where documents cannot independently establish intent, individual responsibility or the outcome of a legal proceeding.