The United States of Israel / Investigation
← Back to The United States of Israel
Gaza / Documentary examination / 11 October 2026

The genocide
they told us
not to see.

In Gaza, repeated displacement, bombardment and the destruction of essential services have altered the daily conditions in which Palestinian families live. In September 2025, an independent United Nations commission concluded that Israeli authorities and security forces had committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. This investigation follows the documents behind that conclusion and the accounts Palestinians have published of their own experiences, then examines the Israeli government's responses and the decisions taken in Washington.

The figures and documentary exhibits in this investigation are attributed to their dated sources. The interactive sections distinguish findings from contested or unresolved claims.

Reader's guide / 01

How to read this investigation

The investigation begins with the material conditions facing Palestinians in Gaza and proceeds through the legal findings, documented U.S. assistance and publicly available first-person accounts. Its pro-Palestinian editorial perspective is explicit, including criticism of political Zionism's role in Palestinian dispossession and unequal rights. The interactive evidence sections distinguish original government statements from independent investigations so readers can see the source and date of each significant claim.

What the courts have decided

The International Court of Justice has issued provisional measures in the case brought by South Africa against Israel, and as of October 2026 it has not decided the genocide allegations on their merits. The September 2025 conclusion of the independent United Nations commission is an investigative finding issued by a different body. Throughout the article, these records are identified according to the authority that produced them and what they establish.

Inspect the ICJ case docket ↗
Editorial position and scope

The political criticism here concerns the development and exercise of state power, including Zionism's relationship to Palestinian displacement and restrictions on rights. Palestinian scholarship informs this framing, while responsibility for particular actions is assigned through documentary evidence. Jewish communities and Israeli civilians are not treated as collectively responsible for decisions made by state institutions or named officials. This distinction allows scrutiny of government policy without collapsing the experiences of different populations into a single claim of culpability.

Read a Palestinian policy perspective ↗
01 / What survived the bombardment

What it takes to survive in Gaza

In early October 2026, aid organizations reported Palestinian families sheltering in unsafe buildings or makeshift encampments as another winter approached. OCHA estimated that approximately 279,000 people were in flood-prone sites or unsafe buildings, while desalination facilities in southern Gaza operated far below capacity because equipment and spare parts were unavailable. Its report estimated that 74% of residents relied on trucked drinking water. These conditions persisted nearly one year after a ceasefire agreement and three years after the war began. [07]

When water supplies are interrupted, families must find other ways to obtain enough safe water for drinking and sanitation, often while living in damaged or temporary accommodation. Medical care also depends on electricity, functioning equipment and supplies that can be replenished. The humanitarian reports describe how the loss of those systems continues to shape the lives of civilians after a particular attack has ended.

The UN commission, Amnesty International and Israeli human-rights organizations reached genocide conclusions after examining conduct affecting Palestinians in Gaza and evidence concerning intent. Israel disputes those findings and says its military campaign sought to defeat Hamas. Readers can consult the institutional reports alongside the state's responses, with the independent commission's legal conclusion clearly separated from the judgment that remains pending before the ICJ. [01] [02] [04] [10]

When civilians are deprived of the means of staying alive, the record cannot be confined to a count of bombs dropped or buildings destroyed.

The Hamas-led attacks of October 7, 2023 killed approximately 1,200 people in Israel and involved the taking of 251 hostages, according to the cited records. The UN commission also documented crimes by Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups against Israeli civilians. Israel subsequently described defeating Hamas and securing the hostages as military objectives. This investigation tests the conduct and restrictions imposed during that campaign against the protections owed to Palestinian civilians and the Genocide Convention's separate requirements concerning prohibited acts and intent. [31] [01]

The ceasefire's aftermath / IOM institutional release / 9 October 2026

Gaza’s shelter crisis in October 2026

In an October 9, 2026 release, the International Organization for Migration estimated that 1.98 million people in Gaza needed shelter-related assistance. Available and incoming materials could partially address only about 17% of assessed winter-specific shelter needs. This percentage measures the share of assessed need that those supplies could cover; it does not represent the share of families already housed, and the source describes tents and makeshift shelters deteriorating as winter approaches.

The 17% represents the share of identified winter-specific shelter requirements covered by partners' available and incoming supplies as reported by IOM. It is not the percentage of Gazans housed, and it does not count deaths or current tents distributed. Read the IOM institutional release (French) ↗
17%WINTER SHELTER NEED COVERED BY REPORTED SUPPLY PIPELINE
1.77mPeople in displacement sites, as of 5 October 2026, per IOM/Site Management Cluster
56%Displacement sites in medium- or high-risk flooding areas, according to IOM's 9 October release
02 / A satellite record

How much of Gaza's built environment was damaged?

55%
UNOSAT identified approximately 55% of structures as damaged or possibly damaged in a May 2024 satellite assessment.
UNOSAT • imagery of 3 May 2024 / Open underlying assessment ↗

UNOSAT's satellite assessments compare images from specified dates and classify structures as damaged or possibly damaged. The figures document changes to the built environment under the agency's methodology, although the imagery does not determine who was inside individual buildings or why each structure was damaged. The legal findings in the next section draw upon a wider evidentiary record.

Measured destruction · Satellite assessment

82% of Gaza's structures

Using imagery dated June 16, 2026, UNOSAT classified 201,290 structures as damaged or possibly damaged, approximately 82% of structures across Gaza, according to OCHA's August summary. The adjacent grid displays the proportion using identical tiles; it is an illustration of the reported percentage and does not show where individual buildings were located.

Open the dated UN source ↗
04 / Medical destruction and children

The destruction of healthcare and its effects on children

In July 2025, Physicians for Human Rights–Israel concluded that the destruction of Gaza's healthcare system met the criteria for genocide, citing attacks on facilities and impediments to treatment. A UN commission report issued in June 2026 recorded at least 20,179 Palestinian children killed and 44,143 injured during its defined review period. The commission also examined what the loss of healthcare and schooling meant for children who survived. The figures are tied to that report's cutoff date and must not be presented as live totals. [05] [06]

The commission's figures represent children whose deaths or injuries were recorded within a defined reporting period. Its report also describes the effect of destroyed or inaccessible treatment on children who survived, including the additional danger created when ordinary care cannot be obtained. The testimony section retains the names and experiences provided by Palestinian witnesses, while photographs and recorded voices remain at their original publishers unless the rights and permissions for reuse are established.

UN Commission / June 2026 report
20,179

Children reported killed in the commission’s review of violations since October 2023. Figure belongs to the report and its covered period; it is not a live casualty counter. Source 06

UN / April 2026 reconstruction assessment
$71.4bn

Estimated ten-year recovery and reconstruction needs, covering housing and the destruction of essential services and productive infrastructure. Source 08

Original satellite visual / held at source

View UNITAR's satellite comparison in its original report with the published methodological context.

Open the original satellite reference ↗
Source-hosted imagery has intentionally not been republished here. This reference supplements the separately dated UNOSAT damage assessments; it is not a visualization of 82% of Gaza's buildings.
05 / The United States

The documented U.S. military relationship

The United States' security relationship with Israel is documented through records that distinguish budgetary commitments from weapons shipments and proposed transactions. The 2016 memorandum anticipated $3.3 billion annually in Foreign Military Financing and $500 million for joint missile defense through fiscal 2028, subject to congressional appropriation. Later government and congressional records describe deliveries and possible sales, whose dates and transaction stages are displayed separately in the evidence desk. [11]

As humanitarian organizations reported extensive civilian deprivation, U.S. officials continued to make decisions about military financing and proposed weapons transfers. The public record permits scrutiny of those decisions, though transaction-level proof is required before connecting a particular item of U.S. equipment to a particular strike. Washington's March 2026 intervention in the ICJ case is documented separately as a legal position on the interpretation of the Genocide Convention.

2016 memorandum / FY2019–FY2028$3.3bn per year

Planned Foreign Military Financing subject to appropriation. This is a U.S. security funding category, not a verified Gaza strike ledger. Source

2016 memorandum / FY2019–FY2028$500m per year

Planned joint missile-defense program funding under the agreement, likewise subject to appropriation. Source

Outstanding documentary workWeapons and decisions

A stronger finding about responsibility for a particular attack would require transaction-level delivery records, reliable end-use evidence and the relevant governmental decision history. Those records are not established by a financing total or a general shipment estimate alone.

Examine the principal counterargument and the limits of these findings

Israel's published legal position emphasizes attacks on Hamas military capabilities and describes warning procedures and humanitarian measures it says were adopted. The documentary comparisons in this investigation examine those official assertions alongside identified incidents and the restrictions humanitarian organizations reported. Their significance is assessed in the context of the commission's broader findings, without assuming that any single incident resolves the legal question of genocidal intent. UN Commission · Amnesty · Reuters

The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant in November 2024 on allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity, rather than genocide. Those criminal proceedings concern individual responsibility and remain distinct from South Africa's case before the International Court of Justice concerning state obligations under the Genocide Convention. ICC · ICJ

Document desk / United States

How to distinguish American financing from delivered weapons

The four tabs separate planned financing, reported deliveries, notified possible sales and proposals still under discussion. Dates, reported quantities and the stage of each transaction are displayed in the source panels. A notification of a possible sale does not demonstrate that its items were delivered, and a delivery report does not independently establish where a specific weapon was used.

Planned framework · subject to appropriation
$3.3bn / year
FY2019–2028 memorandum

Foreign Military Financing

The 2016 bilateral memorandum anticipated $3.3 billion in annual Foreign Military Financing, subject to congressional appropriation. This is a planned funding framework rather than an itemized record of weapons used in Gaza.

Read Congressional Research Service report ↗

Evidentiary boundary: approved funding cannot be equated with a delivered or used weapon.

The figures in this desk describe different periods and transaction stages. They are deliberately kept separate because adding them together would produce an unsupported estimate of weapons used in Gaza.

Official statements · 2023–2025

Official statements in their documentary context

The documentary inquiry into intent requires attention to who spoke, the date of publication and the limits of the available recording. The first source presents the broadcaster's account of Gallant's siege announcement, while the second includes Herzog's contemporaneous clarification of his earlier remarks. A third panel shows how the independent UN commission evaluated statements together with the broader pattern of conduct.

9 OCTOBER 2023 · KNESSET TELEVISION CHANNEL

The siege announcement on a dated Hebrew-language recording

אין חשמל, אין מזון, אין מים, אין דלק.

The broadcaster's Hebrew description states that the defence minister announced a siege and restrictions on essential supplies. The short quoted phrase is reproduced from the channel's published description, rather than presented as a certified transcription of unedited audio.

Inspect the Knesset television recording and description ↗
The exhibits distinguish documented public statements from independently established actions.
Documentary chronology · 2023–2025

Official statements and their contemporary humanitarian context

The sources in this chronology were produced by different institutions at different points in the campaign. Israeli military statements describe public objectives and announced operations, while humanitarian organizations report the circumstances confronting civilians. The commission's later assessment interprets a larger evidentiary record. Readers can follow the dated sequence without treating a public statement as direct proof of responsibility for any specific strike.

An IDF briefing described extensive attacks and consequences for Gaza.

In its October 9, 2023 English briefing, the IDF quoted spokesperson Daniel Hagari discussing attacks involving thousands of munitions and an aerial operation by 60 aircraft, together with an asserted objective that residents remaining in Gaza would understand the consequences of war. The transcript identified targets the IDF said were associated with Hamas, which establishes the military's public account of its purpose while leaving the independent legality and circumstances of individual attacks unresolved.

Open the original IDF English transcript ↗

Evidentiary boundary: Official English text confirms what was published as the IDF's position. It does not establish independent translation of an uncut speech, the approval chain for individual strikes, or criminal responsibility.

Methodological noteThe source types differ: an Israeli institution's primary statement, an independent humanitarian assessment, an official government statement and an investigative commission's subsequent legal conclusion. None should be relabeled as a final International Court of Justice merits judgment.
GZA-008 / Official statements · humanitarian observations · court response / 2023–24

Water restrictions and their documented civilian consequences

This timeline follows reported changes in access to water after the October 2023 siege announcement. UNRWA and OCHA documented interruptions and partial restorations, the Israeli government set out its later account of the restrictions, and the ICJ ordered provisional measures on humanitarian assistance in March 2024. The operational records establish distinct conditions at distinct dates; the underlying individual administrative decisions are not reconstructed here.

How to read this evidenceChoose a date. The publisher, what the document establishes and its limits change with it. Document dates and observed-event dates are distinguished wherever necessary.
DOCUMENT 01 / 062023Broadcast statement + UN observation
KNESSET TV + UNRWA

An announced siege and interruption of supply

Knesset TV published an edited Hebrew-language excerpt of Defense Minister Yoav Gallant's siege announcement on October 9, 2023. UNRWA subsequently reported that drinking-water supply from Israel was cut on that date, creating a contemporaneous connection between the public announcement and reported humanitarian conditions without establishing the individual administrative steps behind each interruption.

Boundary: the edited broadcast is not an uncut military directive. A dated sequence alone does not demonstrate which order caused every interruption.
Why this distinction matters

The UN commission subsequently concluded that the wider record, including statements and a pattern of conduct, supported a finding of genocidal intent. The narrower water chronology helps establish what was publicly announced and what humanitarian organizations reported at the time. It does not identify every person responsible for implementation or independently establish intent behind each separate interruption. Inspect the commission report ↗

07 / Evidentiary challenge · GZA-008–010

Compare the published claims with the underlying records

The comparison desk examines specific claims made by Israeli institutions against the reports and records most relevant to each claim. Where the documents conflict, the panel identifies the precise point of disagreement and retains context that limits what can be concluded. The examples cannot establish the legality of every military operation, and readers can open both original sources.

Official claim / first document

Israel's June 2026 objection

Israel's foreign ministry argued that the UN commission erased Israeli children killed or abducted by Hamas from its analysis.

Read the ministry statement ↗
Source control / second document

What paragraphs 4–5 contain

The commission expressly described harm to Israeli children on October 7 and reiterated findings against Hamas and other armed groups. That fact challenges the categorical wording of the ministry's allegation without determining whether every criticism of the report is false.

Read the commission report ↗

The comparison identifies where published statements disagree and where an institution acknowledged error or supplied a qualification. Findings about individual criminal intent would require a separate evidentiary and legal examination.

08 / Witnesses · Link-only testimony

Palestinians speak through their own testimony

NEW / SIX DOCUMENTED ACCOUNTSLives in GazaMeet Latifa, Jana, Reem, Rama, Nabilah and the team providing mobile care. Read their documented stories and visit each original source. →READER GUIDE / OCTOBER 2026Understanding GazaA question-first explanation of what happened, the evidence, the ceasefire and distinctions that matter. →

The Palestinians whose accounts appear here spoke to B'Tselem field researchers under their own names. Their accounts describe bereavement, the search for basic necessities and repeated displacement, with interview dates visible at the original publisher. The article offers short, attributed summaries and links to each full account. It does not claim that every circumstance described by a witness has been independently adjudicated, and it does not republish personal media without verified permission.

1 September 2025 · Olfat al-Kurd

Hanaa al-Batniji

A mother describes losing her 17-year-old son Ahmad in August 2025 amid hunger, an underlying medical condition and inaccessible treatment. The cause and sequence are reported from her testimony.

Read Hanaa's testimony at B'Tselem ↗
7 June 2026 · Olfat al-Kurd

Israa ‘Aziza (a-Nazli)

A mother of three describes successive displacements, the search for meals and water, and the incomplete relief brought by the October 2025 ceasefire.

Read Israa's testimony at B'Tselem ↗
31 October 2025 · Olfat al-Kurd

Haitham Salem

After release from detention in October 2025, Salem reports learning that his wife and children had died during his imprisonment. The source identifies the family and the reported dates of their deaths.

Read Haitham's testimony at B'Tselem ↗

Source illustrations and photographs are intentionally omitted. No reenacted voices, simulated witnesses, or inferred photographs are used.

Beyond destruction / Palestinian authorship

Palestinian society and political agency beyond the destruction

Palestinian life in Gaza has included education, civic organizations and cultural traditions developed across generations, and those histories persist in the memories and work of displaced communities. Political and legal debates about Gaza's future concern the people who live there and their rights to freedom of movement and self-determination. Palestinian-created research is linked here so the historical and political discussion extends beyond the documented destruction.

Visualizing Palestine brings Palestinian research and visual storytelling to questions of displacement and political rights. Its published work offers a route into the historical context of this investigation and into debates about Palestinian futures. The link is a reference to its publicly available material and does not indicate that the organization participated in or endorsed this project.

06 / The case that remains

What the evidence establishes as of October 2026

Reuters reported that Israeli strikes killed five Palestinians in Gaza on October 10, 2026, during the period following the previous year's ceasefire agreement. The same report attributed a cumulative toll of more than 74,000 Palestinian deaths to Gaza health authorities as of its publication date. Separately, OCHA documented continuing constraints on shelter and water services. These sources describe the persistence of danger and deprivation while retaining their different methods and reporting periods. [12] [07]

The commission's finding of genocide is based on its analysis of prohibited acts and specific intent, with related conclusions issued by other human-rights organizations. Palestinian testimony records the experiences of particular families, while humanitarian assessments measure the destruction of homes and essential services. U.S. records establish documented military and legal decisions. The reader can therefore examine how these separate bodies of evidence relate to the allegations, while recognizing what each source can and cannot establish.

DOCUMENTS AND SOURCES · OCTOBER 2026

Source documents and reporting

The documents cited throughout this investigation are collected below. Each link leads to an available official record, institutional report or published account. Disputed findings and limitations are identified in the accompanying analysis.

37 / INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS · 12 OCTOBER 2023Gaza hospitals risk turning into morgues without electricityContemporaneous warning about the humanitarian consequences of loss of power, with the simultaneous ICRC call for the release of hostages.Read the ICRC statement ↗ 38 / WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN · 4 APRIL 2024Call for independent investigation of the seven aid-worker deathsWCK's original response to the strikes, describing its own account and requesting independent scrutiny. A party's statement is not a judicial finding.Read the original WCK statement ↗ 39 / WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN · 19 AUGUST 2026WCK contests the military prosecutor's later accountNewer published objection and renewed request for an independent commission. The legal status of the incident is not determined by this organizational statement.Read the August 2026 response ↗32 / UNRWA · 14 OCTOBER 2023A matter of life and death: water runs out for 2 million people in GazaStatement reporting no aid entry for one week, electricity blackout and interruption of water from Israel on 9 October. Contemporary UNRWA reporting, not a judicial finding.Open the original document ↗33 / UNRWA · OBSERVATION 16 OCTOBER 2023Situation Report #7: temporary water-line reopeningOnly 14% of Gaza population temporarily benefited from one southern line opened for three hours. Published 17 October; observation as of 16 October 18:00.Open the original document ↗34 / ISRAEL MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS · 2023Hamas–Israel Conflict 2023: Key Legal AspectsIsraeli state legal account updated through 2 November, published in December 2023; asserts there was no siege at that point and describes aid deliveries and water supply.Open the original document ↗35 / INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE · 28 MARCH 2024Order modifying provisional measures in South Africa v. IsraelCourt requires Israel to take necessary measures for unhindered basic services and humanitarian aid. A provisional order, not a final merits finding.Open the original document ↗36 / OCHA · 3 MAY 2024Gaza Flash Update #161: restoration of Al Muntar pipelineOCHA records the Palestinian Water Authority announcement that the pipeline resumed 29 April after about 200 days of shutdown, alongside continuing access limitations.Open the original document ↗31 / UN SECRETARY-GENERAL · 6 OCTOBER 2026Three years since the Hamas-led attacks of 7 October 2023Contemporary United Nations reference for approximately 1,200 killed and 251 people taken hostage in Israel in the 2023 attack; does not establish the lawfulness of the subsequent campaign in Gaza.Open the UN statement ↗ 28 / ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES · 9 OCTOBER 2023IDF spokesperson Hagari's contemporaneous evening briefingOfficial English-language transcript of public military statements, including the attack tempo and claimed Hamas targets; an institutional assertion, not independent verification of each strike.Open the official IDF transcript ↗ 29 / INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS · 13 OCTOBER 2023Humanitarian-law warning regarding evacuation and siegeContemporaneous ICRC assessment of evacuation instructions and denial of essentials. Not a judicial determination of genocidal intent.Open the ICRC release ↗ 30 / PRIME MINISTER'S OFFICE · 30 OCTOBER 2023Netanyahu's official cabinet-meeting remarksFirst-party description of Israel's stated aim to defeat Hamas military and governing capabilities and of continuing air and ground operations.Open the Israeli government statement ↗ 27 / INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE · 22 SEPT 2026Colombia withdraws its 2024 declaration of interventionFormal court notice of third-state procedural participation. Withdrawal does not dismiss or decide South Africa v. Israel.Read the Court's announcement ↗ 24 / KNESSET TELEVISION · 9 OCTOBER 2023Gallant siege announcement — broadcaster-published Hebrew excerptEdited audiovisual excerpt and Hebrew broadcaster description. A primary contemporaneous broadcast record, not uncut footage or a military operations order.Open the published recording ↗ 25 / UN GENEVA BRIEFING · 9 OCTOBER 2026UN-hosted automatically transcribed IOM briefing — non-official transcriptUN-hosted automatic speech-to-text record, explicitly identified by UN Transcripts as non-official and potentially out of sync with its audio. The original IOM press release S26 is the controlling written institutional source.Open UN-hosted automatic transcript ↗ 26 / IOM RELEASE · 9 OCTOBER 2026Published shelter-cluster methodology and flood-risk figuresThe detailed release reports 1.77 million people in displacement sites on 5 October 2026 and 56% of sites at medium-or-high flood risk. French-language version of IOM institutional release.Inspect release and denominators ↗ 23 / UNITED STATES · ICJ DECLARATION · MARCH 2026U.S. declaration of intervention under Article 63 in South Africa v. IsraelPrimary public legal filing. The United States rejects the genocide allegation and asks the Court to apply its established intent-inference standard. The filing is a party state's position on treaty construction, not a merits ruling.Read the U.S. filing ↗ 01 / UN INDEPENDENT COMMISSION · 2025Legal analysis of Israel’s conduct in Gaza under the Genocide ConventionPrimary investigative report, A/HRC/60/CRP.3; commission concluded four Article II acts and genocidal intent.Open report ↗ 02 / AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL · 2024“You Feel Like You Are Subhuman” — research summaryIndependent assessment of conduct, official statements and specific intent.Open findings ↗ 16 / HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH · DECEMBER 2024Extermination and Acts of Genocide: Deprivation of WaterDetailed investigation into official decisions, water infrastructure, severe deprivation and acts of genocide.Open report ↗ 03 / INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT · 2024Arrest warrants for Netanyahu and GallantCharges concern alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity, not genocide.Open court release ↗ 04 / B’TSELEM · JULY 2025Israeli rights groups’ genocide findingsB’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights–Israel’s reports.Open findings ↗ 05 / PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS–ISRAEL · JULY 2025Genocide in Gaza — medical infrastructure studyAssessment of deliberate destruction of healthcare systems and conditions of survival.Open study ↗ 06 / UN INDEPENDENT COMMISSION · JUNE 2026“The essence of childhood has been destroyed”A/HRC/62/CRP.2; evidence concerning deaths, injury and wider harms to children.Open report ↗ 07 / OCHA · OCTOBER 2026Humanitarian situation report, 2 October 2026Displacement, flood risk, water trucking and operational restrictions.Open report ↗ 08 / UN–EU–WORLD BANK · APRIL 2026Final Gaza Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment$71.4 billion estimated recovery and reconstruction need over a decade.Open assessment ↗ 09 / UN TREATY TEXT · 1948Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of GenocideArticle II prohibited acts; Article I duty to prevent and punish.Read legal text ↗ 10 / INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE · CASE 192South Africa v. IsraelProceedings concerning state responsibility; no final merits judgment established in this preview.Open case docket ↗ 11 / U.S. CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICEIsrael: Major Issues and U.S. Relations2016 security-aid memorandum and annual funding framework.Open CRS report ↗ 12 / REUTERS · OCTOBER 2026Israeli strikes kill five people in Gaza, medics sayAttributed contemporary reporting; provides Israeli position and post-ceasefire context.Open report ↗ 13 / UNOSAT · MAY 2024Satellite-derived structural damage assessmentApproximately 55% of structures classified damaged or possibly damaged.Open assessment ↗ 14 / UNOSAT · OCTOBER 2025Comprehensive damage assessmentApproximately 81% of structures affected using imagery from 11 October 2025.Open assessment ↗ 15 / OCHA–UNOSAT · AUGUST 2026Updated Gaza structure-damage estimatesApproximately 82% of structures damaged; updated satellite-based picture.Open report ↗

Design and editorial method

Further reading includes research and analysis by Palestinian authors, along with materials explaining the standards used to make this documentary interface accessible.

Visualizing Palestine · research and narrative principles ↗Nielsen Norman Group · scroll animation and comprehension ↗WCAG 2.2 · accessibility requirements ↗
Plain language / Questions readers will ask

Questions about the evidence and its limits

Has the ICJ ruled that Israel committed genocide?

As of October 2026, the ICJ has ordered provisional measures in South Africa's case but has not decided the genocide allegation on its merits. The UN commission reached its own genocide determination in September 2025, applying an investigative standard to the evidence it reviewed. The commission and Court have different mandates, and the website links both records.

ICJ docket ↗
Does damage to 82% of buildings prove intent by itself?

UNOSAT's estimate concerns structures assessed as damaged or possibly damaged from satellite imagery dated June 2026. It documents the extraordinary extent of destruction, while the legal issue of genocidal intent requires assessment of additional conduct and evidence. The UN commission reached its conclusion from that wider record.

OCHA–UNOSAT assessment ↗
Does a U.S. arms authorization prove a particular strike used that weapon?

Financing commitments, sale notifications, approvals, shipments and verified use are different stages in a weapons transaction. Public records document extensive U.S. security assistance to Israel, but linking a specific munition to an individual strike requires evidence beyond a general aid figure.

CRS assistance record ↗
How are survivors represented?

The witness section links to attributed B'Tselem interviews and provides brief summaries. It does not reproduce photographs or recordings without verified reuse rights and does not create simulated survivor testimony. Each witness's original account remains available at its publisher's website.

B'Tselem testimony archive ↗
After the investigation / Reader action

Consult the records and available public resources

The resource links connect readers to original records, official ways to contact elected representatives and published information about Palestinian-rights advocacy. This page does not collect contact details, and links to organizations do not imply sponsorship or an editorial partnership.

The resources are provided for independent use, and the website does not send messages or disclose information on a reader's behalf.

Documentary record · October 2026
The evidence presented here is attributed to dated records and published reporting. Source limitations remain visible where documents cannot independently establish intent, individual responsibility or the outcome of a legal proceeding.